Pat Manson, Head of Unit Cultural Heritage and Technology Enhanced Learning outlines the workprogram
Pat Manson, Head of Unit Cultural Heritage and Technology Enhanced Learning
outlines the workprogram
Increase availability of content
creation mamagement and reuse of content
Digital Libraries
Large scale European wide digital libraries
Radically new approache to digital preservation
Technology enhances learning
Powerpoint at:
Medium term 3/7 years
Longer term 5 -10 years
Ongoing activities should be consulted
Increasingly active use of content and creativity
multidisplinarity, not pure technologically definitions of the research
three main strands since FP5
- access to cultura and science resources
- Intelligent heritage
- Digital Preservation
Digital Libraries
no replication of existing work will be funded
multilingual acccess and management
Intelligent Heritage
Andvanced visualization, 3D capture, new methods of access.
Digital Preservation
OAIS compliant systems
Digital Libraries
semantich based search facilities needs still work
robust and scalable environments
cost=effective digitazation.
Radically new approaches to digital preservation
dynamic and volatile information
automatic procedures
it has to be imbedded into content creation from the beginning
Approach and impact
IPs- STREPs and NOE
Building Centres of competence for digitidation and preservation
TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING
- user centred solutions
- scientific knowledge base how to learn, how to we demonstrate the benefits of investments in this solutiosn
- pedagogical and cognitive foundations on top of technological aspects and social aspects
- fostering further a multidisciplinary approach
- people should understand and master the subject in their context of learning
- understanding learners in difficult and complex situations
- learning in communities fo practice
- knowledge and education in workplaces
- making learning as exciting ad computer games
Medium Term
Responsive environments for technology enhanced learning
Longer tem
Adaptive and intuitive Learning systems
The total amount in Challenge 4 is 102 Million Euros
Closing date for proposals is May 8
Proposal essentials - what to consider in making a proposal
How to make a winning proposal
- no mixing of digital libraries and technology enhanced learning
- projects may be medium term and/or long term
points to consider
- already tackled
- new insights or new problem
- who will benefit user communities
- substantitive benefits
= potential risks
Evaluation Criteria
- Scientific and technical quality
- Implementation
- Impact (rationale! effort, more than standard business plan!)
Scientific and technical quality
Problem statement, and derive objectives
- smart objectivesl time table
- general objectives
- specific objectives
- operational objectives
Identify Success indicators
for the muldisciplinary character find the right partnes, they might not be necessarily the neares or more convenient.
For Digital Libraries involve relevant CH organizations
Make managment work
Integrated Projects
-keep the consortium manageable
-not merely a function of size or funding
- IP is not a big STREB, there must be a real integration issue
4-7 IPs
NoE
size and funding much smaller than in FP6
STREPS
focussed objectives
Research and demonstration activities
9-11 streps over call 1 and call 3
40 Million EU for streps
CSAs
can embrace standards development stimulating adoption and take up
3-5 CSA for 5 Mio Euro
ADMINISTRATIVE and CONTRACTUAL MATTERS
Grant agreement
Beneficiary
Funding Schemes
Certificate on Financial Statement
TimeLine
Call 1 closes 8 May
Evaluation 4-23 June
Hearings 25-29 June (only IPs and NOEs)
Negotiations August/September
Signature before year end
call3 to be published in December
Presentations and reports will go on a website!